Thought Leadership ipCG Conference Publications Events ipCG Blog Press
|
Degrees of Patent Analysis: Which Approach to Use and When?
POSTED BY Kate Shore and Sarju Bharucha AT 12:45 P.M. FEBRUARY 16, 2010
ipCG Blog Main Page ipCG Home Contact Us
Technical patent analysis (not legal) is a valuable tool for decision-making,
for companies, inventors, universities and even investors. The approach used
to gather and analyze patent data heavily influences the type and quality of
data and how it can be utilized. Determining the correct patent analysis approach
can be difficult, particularly since getting high quality data can require ample
resources (e.g. time, manpower, tools). Depending on the purpose of the search,
stakeholders involved, and other factors, certain approaches may be more appropriate
for specific circumstances. The three main approaches for patent analysis are:
- Online Inquiry: An online inquiry can lead to a quick answer
regarding a particular data field of interest. For example, if you are trying
to determine who the inventors are on a patent, a simple Google® search
of the patent number will provide a quick and easy answer. This type of inquiry
should be used when the type of inquiry is seeking basic information about
a patent (e.g., inventors, assignees, number of claims, etc.) Tools such as
Freepatents.com, the USPTO, esp@cenet, etc. are appropriate for these searches.
- “Broad Sweep” Search: A “broad sweep”
search is used to take a high-level view of an industry space or do a first
pass assessment of a heavily populated IP space. The data obtained in this
type of search is used as a tool to provide additional guidance and direction
on where more focused searching should be performed. In this case, the depth
of a search may include loosely defined search parameters such as searching
all jurisdictions (e.g., US, EP, WO, JP, KR, CN, IN, etc.), a broader timeframe
(e.g., 1970 – present), and an arrangement of broader keywords and/or
search strings. This type of search is mainly electronic, i.e. analysis is
based directly on the output of the search strings without any manual manipulation.
(Note: ipCapital calls this type of search ipMining®.)
- Targeted Search: A targeted search is typically used to
answer a set of pre-determined business issues or capture data needed to make
business decisions. Here, the business issues provide the focus for the search,
including interest areas, competitors, inventors, and other parameters such
as jurisdiction and timeframe. This approach creates a high quality, business-focused
dataset, which is a critical input for developing a data-driven IP
strategy for a particular product or industry space. Notably, data in
a Targeted Search is human-screened for relevancy and categorized by one or
more custom fields to foster important insights into space. (Note: ipCapital
calls this type of search ipAnalytics®.)
Good preparation for a patent search can lead to successful and effective patent
analysis, whereas the lack of preparation can lead to the disappointed stakeholders,
missed IP opportunities, or wasted time. We have found that there are nine key
factors that control the decision around what type of patent search is needed.
- Purpose: Am I looking for a quick answer to my questions
or I am searching for answers to business issues?
- Stakeholder: Who will the results be shared with and what
influence and/or interest do they have on my search?
- Focus & Scope: What are the characteristics of the
space I am searching and how broadly do I need to search?
- Resources: What resources are available and appropriate,
including time, people, tools, and funding?
- Assistance: Can I do this search on my own or do I need
expert assistance?
- Depth: How thoroughly do I need to search to find what
I need?
- Data Capture: Will I need this information just this once
or again in the future? Am I disseminating the data to others?
- Quality: Does the data need to be approximate or certain?
- Output: How will the results be documented and communicated?
So how do you decide which patent analysis approach is needed or understand
the tradeoffs of using one approach over another? The table below provides an
easy-to-use guide for choosing the right patent search approach for your circumstances,
using the nine key factors.
Degrees of Technical Patent Analysis: Decision Making Tool
| |
Online
Inquiry |
"Broad
Sweep" Search |
Targeted
Search |
| 1. Purpose |
Answer a simple question |
Understand rudimentary
trends in a space |
Data to support decision-making,
Answer business issues |
| 2. Stakeholder |
Technical |
Technical, Project Management
|
Technical, Project Management,
Executives, Marketing |
| 3. Focus
& Scope |
Detailed question |
10,000 ft view of a space,
Uncomplicated space |
Complex space, Very specific
concentration |
| 4. Resources |
Low cost & quick |
Dictated by the scope |
Flexible (based on business
issues), High ROI |
| 5. Assistance |
None needed or IP analyst |
IP expert |
IP Strategist |
| 6. Depth |
Few search strings, tight
parameters (e.g. single inventor, key competitor) |
Set of search strings,
many jurisdictions, wider time span |
Comprehensive search strategy,
detailed search strings |
| 7. Data
Capture |
Print a patent or possibly
not needed? |
Ideal, not required |
Valuable business resource
- critical to keep |
| 8. Quality |
Medium - low number of
results enables quick human scan |
Medium-Low - relies on
search string accuracy, lack of normalization |
High - human screened data,
custom fields added |
| 9. Output |
Answer to question, informal
report |
Trend analysis, Charts,
Weak observations |
Detailed insights, Actionable
competitive intelligence, Strategy recommendations |
| Summary |
Fast,
easy, direct |
Best
approach for an early investigation into a space or dealing with a very
large dataset |
Needed
if the output will be used for making business decisions, Highest resource
demand yields highest quality data |
TAGS: Kate Shore | Process | Sarju Bharucha
|