Patent Monetization requires Invention on Demand

By John Cronin, CEO of ipCapital Group


Rapid changes in the patent monetization landscape require novel strategies to maintain profitability and competitiveness. In light of the growing importance of intellectual property (IP) as a strategic advantage factor, organizations are progressively acknowledging the criticality of maximizing the revenue potential of their patent portfolios. Nevertheless, this optimization is frequently impeded by several inherent difficulties in the portfolios. This paper posits that the resolution to these obstacles can be found in the implementation of “Invention on Demand,” a process that utilizes information derived from an organization’s intellectual property landscape in conjunction with creativity tools and strategies for ongoing enhancement to generate concepts that substantially augment the financial viability of patents.

Challenges in Existing Patent Portfolios

Patent portfolios encounter many obstacles that may impede their capacity for monetization. These challenges comprise swift technological advancements that render them obsolete, gaps in time and the value chain, and an emphasis on the inventor’s viewpoint rather than that of prospective monetization targets. Frequently, these portfolios exhibit an absence of citations, which suggests a comparatively diminished level of influence or establishment within the discipline. Moreover, their lack of value chain analysis, practical application evidence, and transparent valuation significantly reduce their attractiveness to prospective licensees or purchasers. Difficulties in reverse engineering, the susceptibility of patents to being circumvented, and a lack of alignment with pertinent monetization objectives compound the difficulties associated with harnessing these portfolios for revenue generation. It is vital to address these concerns to optimize patent portfolios for efficient monetization.

Old Portfolio and Rapid Technological Changes

Patent portfolios are susceptible to rapid obsolescence due to the unparalleled rate of technological advancement, which diminishes their utility and lucrative prospects. Patent portfolios are progressively susceptible to obsolescence due to the unprecedented rate of technological advancement, which substantially reduces their utility and potential for financial gain. A patent issued today reflects the state of technology and market demands that are three to four years old as a result of the patent application and issuance process, owing to the rapid acceleration of technological innovation. The temporal delay implies that recently granted patents might not correspond to the present technological environment, given that substantial changes can transpire within a few years, rendering inventions that were once at the forefront obsolete. In today’s rapidly evolving technological environment, the conventional belief that patents increase in value with time is losing relevance. The fact that entire technology sectors can undergo significant transformations or become outdated in a matter of years highlights the difficulty of sustaining a patent portfolio that is both pertinent and profitable. To thrive in this ever-evolving landscape, patent portfolio management must adopt a more proactive and prospective stance, acknowledging that the swift progression of technology can have substantial repercussions on the worth and practicality of patents.

Gaps in Time

Portfolios may encounter periods during which innovation has lagged behind developments in the market or technology, resulting in coverage gaps. Patent portfolios frequently demonstrate temporal gaps in innovation, which occur when the filing rate fails to correspond with the swift advancements in market or technology trends. This leads to substantial gaps in the coverage of intellectual property. The absence of consistent innovation filing, distinguished by lengthy periods of inactivity followed by a surge of activity, may indicate that the intellectual property lacks continuity and has lost intrinsic value. Intervals of more than three years between filings strongly indicate that the entity is not maintaining its strategic emphasis on innovation. This discontinuity diminishes the portfolio’s perceived value and suggests to potential investors and competitors that the organization might not be entirely dedicated to maintaining or advancing its technological leadership. Sustained innovation and consistent patent applications are imperative in the contemporary, rapidly evolving technological landscape to preserve a competitive advantage and guarantee all-encompassing protection for novel and developing technologies. These deficiencies expose the organization to the risk of falling behind rivals and reduce the portfolio’s monetization potential, as gaps in coverage may be interpreted as opportunities for others to develop solutions around existing patents, further undermining the market relevance and value of the initial portfolio.

Gaps in Value Chain

Frequently, patent portfolios fail to offer comprehensive protection or opportunities throughout the complete value chain of a technology, neglecting critical components that possess substantial monetization potential. This omission may diminish the appeal of a portfolio to corporations seeking to procure intellectual property (IP) rights. Typically, corporations acquire intellectual property (IP) to accomplish strategic goals, such as establishing dominance over suppliers or customers, utilizing it to introduce novel products, or incorporating it into their internal value chain. Value chain expansion is intrinsic to organizations’ growth and generation of supplementary top-line revenue. Organizations can potentially redefine their industry, gain entry into untapped markets, or increase efficiency by incorporating novel technologies or innovations into their value chain.

To establish its worth and appeal for acquisition, a portfolio of patents must unequivocally illustrate its capacity to generate value throughout various stages of the value chain. Intellectual property should safeguard the fundamental technology and the value chain’s downstream and upstream applications, processes, and products. As an illustration, a technology company engaged in developing innovative battery technology would derive advantages from a comprehensive portfolio encompassing the battery’s composition and manufacturing procedures, device integration, recycling techniques, and software applications designed to oversee battery life. The extensive scope of this coverage guarantees that any organization that obtains the portfolio can utilize it to safeguard and regulate diverse aspects of the industry, ranging from primary resources to final-user software.

Moreover, a direct correlation exists between the capacity of a patent portfolio to facilitate a company’s expansion into novel sectors of its value chain and its ability to stimulate business expansion and augment revenue. It is strategic for a business to acquire intellectual property that either fills gaps in its current portfolio or creates new opportunities for product development and market expansion. This enables the organization to expand its range of products and services, decrease reliance on external vendors, and potentially generate additional sources of income through technology licensing or joint ventures.

A patent portfolio that fails to provide evident value chain advantages is not worthy of acquisition. The acquiring company should be granted the authority to safeguard current innovations and exploit novel prospects for expansion and development. The correlation between the portfolio’s scope of protection and the organization’s value chain objectives is of utmost importance for the monetization potential of the intellectual property and the acquisition’s overall success.

Focus on the patent portfolio owner’s Perspective is often wrong!

The concern regarding an overemphasis on the viewpoint of the patent portfolio owner stems from a fundamental contradiction between the inventor’s objectives and the demands or interests of the market. When a portfolio developed and marketed for years fails to pique the interest of potential licensees or buyers, each operating with their priorities and perspectives, this misalignment can become especially problematic.

A fundamental obstacle in this context is that inventors and portfolio managers might be overly fixated on their perception and assessment of the technology, frequently placing excessive emphasis on its technical merits or the distinctiveness of the innovation. Although these qualities are undeniably significant, they may not directly correspond with the pragmatic requirements, financial objectives, or strategic concerns of other participants in the sector. Organizations seeking to procure or license novel technologies frequently pursue solutions that can promptly address challenges, establish a competitive edge, or introduce untapped market prospects. Failure to account for these broader industry perspectives in a patent portfolio excessively concentrated on the inventor’s vision may result in neglecting crucial elements that render the technology commercially viable or appealing to others.

Furthermore, the absence of market demand for a particular portfolio could suggest failing to recognize or comprehend the market’s present demands, trends, and pain points. This implies that the portfolio may not be as pertinent or practical in response to the changing demands of the industry as was initially perceived. The rapid rate of technological advancement further complicates this circumstance; more recent developments may overshadow an invention that was once at the forefront of its field or become less significant due to changes in market demand or regulatory environments.


Neglecting to sufficiently incorporate or incorporate the perspectives of prospective commercial partners, competitors, and end-users may result in lost prospects for licensing, sales, or collaboration. At the same time, an excessive emphasis is placed on the portfolio owner’s viewpoint. Additionally, this may lead to unanticipated returns on investments made in patenting and marketing strategies, given that the true value proposition to others remains ambiguous or lacks persuasiveness.

A transition towards a market-centric approach in developing and managing patent portfolios is necessary to tackle this issue effectively. This requires engaging in extensive market research, actively consulting with prospective industry partners to gain insights into their requirements and obstacles, and consistently reevaluating the portfolio’s congruence with prevailing market trends. Through the adoption of a viewpoint that reflects the industry as a whole and potential client, portfolio owners can discern novel avenues for revenue generation, adapt their approaches to emphasize the practicality of their technologies in commercial settings, and ultimately bolster the desirability and worth of their patent holdings in the estimation of external parties.

Lack of Citations

Citations to patents are an essential metric for assessing the significance and impact of a patent in its respective technological field. The citations to prior art in subsequent patents indicate the cited patent’s fundamental contribution to promoting additional innovations. Many citations indicate that the patent has significantly contributed to advancing subsequent technologies, emphasizing its utility and significance. The pertinence above confers legal and technical weight and augments the patent’s commercial appeal. Companies seeking to acquire or license intellectual property frequently pursue highly cited patents due to their perceived strategic value and established history of driving technological progress.

Conversely, patents that receive few citations might indicate skepticism regarding originality, practicality, or pertinence. These patents could be seen as detached from the broader technological ecosystem, which could give rise to inquiries regarding their incorporation into the industry’s continuous innovation and development processes. The lack of significant references may suggest that the described technology has not been implemented or expanded upon by others, which could suggest it is not innovative or practical enough to motivate additional developments. Entities seeking to generate revenue from their intellectual property may find this isolation especially problematic, as it could discourage prospective licensees or purchasers from prioritizing technologies that have a tangible influence on the respective field.

In the current highly competitive technological environment, the citation history of a portfolio of patents serves as a critical indicator of its worth. Although not the sole value metric, the quantity of citations a patent garner indicates its significance and impact on subsequent innovations. Patents that receive significant citations are esteemed due to their demonstrated impact on technological advancement, which enhances their appeal for licensing and acquisition purposes. As a result, patents that receive few citations may encounter difficulties when attempting to establish their commercial feasibility. This highlights the significance of citations as an indicator of a patent’s influence and market potential.

Absence of Value Chain Thinking

When value chain thinking is absent during the development and management of patent portfolios, their ability to capitalize on a vast array of monetization opportunities at various stages of product development and application is significantly diminished. Consideration of how intellectual property can be utilized to improve or safeguard each stage in the production, distribution, and consumption of a service or product constitutes value chain thinking. By implementing this strategy, portfolios can encompass patents that address advancements beyond the product, such as manufacturing procedures, distribution techniques, user interface, and post-purchase assistance. By providing such extensive coverage, each stage of the product’s development process, from inception to market entry, is guaranteed to present a unique opportunity to generate revenue and gain a competitive edge. Patents that incorporate the perspectives of suppliers and customers are especially advantageous, as they guarantee the safeguarding of innovations in manners that contribute value to the complete ecosystem, starting from the procurement of raw materials to the final experience of the end-user.

This comprehensive approach is frequently disregarded without a strategic intellectual property (IP) strategy. Numerous organizations prioritize the protection of their products’ underlying technologies to the exclusion of the broader context in which these products are manufactured, distributed, and utilized. Neglecting this aspect may lead to lost prospects for capitalizing on intellectual property to establish obstacles for rivals seeking to enter, negotiate more favorable conditions with suppliers, or provide distinctive attributes that bolster customer loyalty and satisfaction. By embracing this framework, organizations can effectively recognize and safeguard innovations that foster customer engagement, cost reduction, efficiency, and market differentiation throughout the value chain. By doing so, the portfolio is not only fortified but also brought into closer alignment with the overarching strategy and objectives of the organization, thereby augmenting its capacity to generate enduring revenue.

Implementing an IP strategy oriented toward the value chain is frequently complicated, necessitating an in-depth knowledge of the industry environment and the internal procedures contributing to product development and delivery. Collaboration across departments, including R&D, operations, marketing, and sales, is required throughout the value chain to identify patentable innovations. Despite these obstacles, the advantages of adopting this methodology are considerable. An all-encompassing portfolio that encompasses the complete value chain of a product not only provides enhanced protection but also presents many opportunities for financial gain via licensing, collaborations, and market penetration. Fundamentally, value chain thinking converts the portfolio of patents from a defensive asset to a strategic instrument that stimulates innovation and business expansion.

No Evidence of Use

Evidence of Use (EoU) pertains to concrete occurrences in which a patented technology is implemented in industry-specific products, services, or processes. The presented evidence is of the utmost importance, as it establishes the patent’s commercial viability and practical applicability, thereby substantially enhancing its appeal to prospective licensees or purchasers. By solving a tangible issue or enhancing pre-existing solutions, EoU can be a persuasive demonstration that the technology functions and possesses market value. This further enhances the perceived value of the patent by emphasizing its pertinence to present-day industry demands. EoU reduces the risks associated with investing in or adopting the technology by providing a clearer picture of how intellectual property can be utilized by businesses seeking to license or acquire patents. Furthermore, patents with established practical applications are frequently perceived as less speculative and more likely to yield financial gains; thus, they are favored alternatives for strategic alliances or acquisitions.

Ease of Design Around

The ease with which a patent can be designed around or circumvented poses a substantial obstacle to its monetization value. Patents formulated with limited claims or neglecting to consider the scope of technological methodologies that accomplish the same objective render themselves susceptible to being circumvented by rival firms. This susceptibility frequently arises from an absence of thorough anticipation when contemplating alternative or forthcoming technologies that may achieve comparable results. Consequently, if a patent safeguards a method or product, rivals may discover an alternative approach to accomplish the identical function without violating the patent rights; this would reduce the market exclusivity and value of the initial patent.

Failure to adequately invest around one’s patents before filing and a deficiency in strategic intellectual property planning that accounts for potential future technological advancements contribute to the ease of designing around patents. Inventors and businesses may fail to devote adequate time and resources to investigating every conceivable variation or embodiment of their inventions, creating opportunities for rivals to exploit. Furthermore, the swift rate at which technological advancements transpire can also result in the obsolescence of current cutting-edge concepts or the emergence of novel technologies that diminish the significance of existing patents. This situation highlights the significance of proactive patent strategies that safeguard present innovations and foresee forthcoming advancements in the domain. Effective patent strategies should incorporate a proactive approach to inventing around one’s patents. This entails identifying and acquiring rights to potential improvements and variations of the original invention. Organizations can establish a more extensive barrier to entry regarding their fundamental technologies, thereby impeding unauthorized development of designs that circumvent their patents and violate their intellectual property rights. By adopting this strategy, the initial patent gains more significant value, and the IP portfolio is fortified, guaranteeing that it will continue to be a valuable asset for subsequent monetization endeavors.

Lack of IP Valuation

Navigating the intricacies of licensing agreements or sales becomes considerably more challenging without a precise intellectual property (IP) valuation. IP valuation is an essential procedure that establishes a monetary value for portfolios and individual patents, thereby supplying a tangible foundation for negotiations. Without such an assessment, prospective purchasers or licensees encounter challenges when attempting to determine the value of the intellectual property, which introduces unpredictability and may compromise the negotiation procedure. An accurately ascertained valuation serves the dual purpose of elucidating the financial anticipations of the licensing or selling party and furnishing the purchaser or licensee with knowledge regarding the prospective return on investment. This clarity is crucial for the parties involved to reach mutually beneficial agreements. Without it, negotiations may encounter obstacles as both parties lack confidence in the proposed or requested value. Furthermore, the absence of valuation may cause the intellectual property to be undervalued, resulting in missed revenue opportunities or overvalued, discouraging interested parties from moving forward with the transaction.

An exhaustive evaluation of numerous elements—including the patent’s strength, applicability to present and future market demands, market size, market growth rates, royalty rates, and so forth—is required to establish an accurate IP valuation. A thorough comprehension of the market environment, proficiency in the invention’s technical domain, and business acumen are both essential for this exhaustive analysis. By allocating resources towards a comprehensive valuation procedure, organizations can enhance the marketability of their intellectual property assets and utilize their patents as strategic instruments during business negotiations. In addition, a substantiated valuation can function as a compelling point of contention during negotiations, aiding in attaining advantageous conditions and optimizing the monetary prospects of the intellectual property portfolio. Thus, precise intellectual property valuation transcends its function as a transactional aid and transforms into a strategic asset that augments such property’s overall worth and market appeal.

Difficulty in Reverse Engineering

Patents that pose significant challenges to reverse engineering often present a double-edged sword in their attractiveness for licensing and enforcement. On the one hand, the difficulty in reverse engineering can serve as a strong deterrent against potential infringement, as a company may find it too complex or costly to decipher who is using the patented technology. Their inability to reverse engineer a patent can diminish its appeal for monetization through sale or license. If competitors or potential licensees cannot easily understand or evaluate the technology the patent covers, they may be less inclined to engage in monetization negotiations.

Furthermore, the challenge of identifying infringement due to the difficulty of reverse engineering complicates the enforcement of patent rights. For a patent owner, proving that another party has used their patented technology without authorization is foundational to enforcing their IP rights and securing royalties or damages. When technology cannot be easily reverse-engineered, gathering concrete evidence of infringement becomes harder, weakening the patent owner’s position in potential litigation or settlement discussions. This difficulty impacts the direct monetization of the patent through enforcement actions. It may deter potential buyers or licensees who see the patent’s enforceability as a critical factor in its value. Consequently, while the complexity of technology and its resistance to reverse engineering might protect it from being easily copied, it also introduces significant challenges to leveraging the patent in strategic IP monetization and enforcement efforts.

Invention on Demand: A Solution

To promote innovation within organizations, Invention on Demand is a systematic and strategic approach that utilizes a comprehensive analysis of a given entity’s intellectual property (IP) portfolio to inspire and inform the development of new inventions. This procedure entails the application of diverse creativity tools to foster innovative thought and reveal original resolutions to pre-existing challenges. By adopting this comprehensive methodology, organizations can methodically discern prospects for innovation within their portfolios of intellectual property, thereby rectifying any deficiencies or vulnerabilities and augmenting the overall worth of their assets.

Invention on Demand has exhibited its effectiveness for the last thirty years, as evidenced by the remarkable success rate of 85% attained by newly filed patents utilizing this approach before issuance. The substantial success rate observed serves as evidence of the method’s efficacy in producing patentable concepts and guaranteeing their requisite levels of novelty, non-obviousness, and utility to satisfy the rigorous criteria set forth by patent offices. Through the proactive resolution of deficiencies and obstacles present in an organization’s current portfolio, Invention on Demand enables it to maintain a competitive edge by forecasting forthcoming technological demands and advancements. Adopting a forward-looking perspective guarantees that patents will continue to be valuable assets even as industries undergo transformations and remain pertinent to the current market. As a result, patents generated in this manner have a higher probability of being commercializable, providing organizations with concrete prospects for licensing, forming partnerships, and generating additional sources of income; thus, they consolidate their competitive advantage in the market.

Updating the Portfolio for Monetization

A multifaceted approach is utilized by Invention on Demand to improve patent portfolios, ensuring they are more pertinent, all-encompassing, and in line with present and future market demands. By considering potential monetization targets, designing innovations around established portfolios, and adapting to technological advancements, this methodology guarantees the creation of valuable and appealing intellectual property. The approach identifies untapped monetization opportunities by integrating value chain thinking, addressing knowledge gaps to expand technology coverage, and strategically designing foundational patents to enhance their citation potential and market relevance. Moreover, optimizing the portfolio’s alignment with market demands, expanding the variety of intellectual property types, and forecasting forthcoming advancements collectively bolster the portfolio’s commercial attractiveness and potential for generating revenue. Enhancing the ease of reverse engineering patents is an additional critical factor in fostering licensing and collaboration, thereby augmenting the portfolio’s overall value.

Invent from Monetized Entities’ Perspectives

By embracing the perspectives of prospective monetization targets via the Invention-on-demand methodology, one can guarantee the creation of intellectual property (IP) that is not solely groundbreaking but also exceedingly pertinent and attractive to the target market. Inventors and businesses can customize their inventions to fulfill the particular demands of those entities likely to monetize or leverage the technology by comprehending and incorporating their needs, challenges, and aspirations. By adopting this viewpoint, one can gain a more profound understanding of the business environment, which in turn identifies potential areas for innovation that are in close accordance with market developments, customer demands, and competitors’ weaknesses. Consequently, the intellectual property produced using this approach is considerably more likely to tackle practical challenges and provide concrete advantages, rendering it exceedingly appealing to prospective licensees, purchasers, or collaborators who perceive immediate worth in incorporating these advancements into their offerings.

Moreover, adopting the viewpoint of monetized entities when inventing promotes a customer-centric approach to innovation, thereby facilitating the development of intellectual property that is not only technically proficient but also economically feasible. This mechanism establishes a connection between technological innovation and market implementation, guaranteeing that newly granted patents encompass original concepts and functional resolutions that can be readily incorporated into established value chains or market sectors. This unity with the market amplifies the probability of profitable monetization. It escalates the certainty of adoption and implementation, given that the inventions intrinsically address the identified deficiencies and expressed demands of industry stakeholders. Thus, through emphasizing the perspectives of individuals who will ultimately benefit from, sell, or utilize these advancements, Invention on Demand optimizes the pertinence and desirability of the resultant intellectual property, thereby establishing a foundation for monetization strategies that are more efficient and lucrative.

Invent Around Existing Portfolios

Implementing a strategic approach by inventing around existing patent functions as a preventive measure to ensure the preservation of the original intellectual property’s (IP) value by impeding the development of comparable, non-infringing alternatives by competitors. A corporation can establish a protective moat around its fundamental innovation by discerning and securing patents for numerous alternative methods or technologies that yield equivalent or comparable results to those described in the original patent. By adopting this approach, any organization seeking to enter the identical technological domain will have to compete not only with the primary patent but also with a collection of patents that protect alternative methodologies. As a result, this substantially elevates the obstacles for rivals endeavoring to devise innovations that circumvent the initial patent to evade its safeguards.

This extensive protection means that for a prospective purchaser or licensee, obtaining solely the original patent rights might not be adequate to guarantee the ability to conduct business without violating the neighboring patents. To optimize their benefits and mitigate the risk of potential legal ramifications, they should contemplate procuring or granting licenses for the complete collection of patents, encompassing the initial and those generated via the inventing-around approach. Adopting a comprehensive approach to patenting not only increases the intrinsic worth of the initial patent by incorporating it into a broader and more formidable portfolio of intellectual property but also significantly fortifies the patent holder’s negotiating position. By its surrounding inventions, the original patent constitutes a more valuable and compelling asset encompassing a more comprehensive range of technological solutions. This guarantees that any entity interested in the innovation must actively participate in the portfolio to obtain comprehensive access and use rights.

Modernize the Portfolio

It is essential to modernize the patent portfolio to remain competitive in the face of swift technological advancements and shifting market demands. This procedure entails the ongoing evaluation and revision of the portfolio to guarantee that it mirrors the most recent technological advancements and trends. Organizations can enhance the appeal of their intellectual property to prospective licensees and buyers in search of innovative solutions by ensuring its continued relevance. Modernization encompasses the issuance of fresh patents that safeguard the most recent advancements and the reevaluation of pre-existing patents to detect those that have diminished in value or become obsolete due to technological progress. By adopting this proactive stance, organizations can concentrate their resources on sectors with the most significant potential for financial gain and strategic superiority. As a result, their intellectual property assets continue to be substantial sources of income and a competitive advantage in the market.

Furthermore, updating the portfolio extends beyond acquiring new patents; it necessitates a strategic outlook that proactively foresees forthcoming technological trends and market demands. By strategically aligning their portfolios with emerging technologies and industry trends, organizations can establish themselves as frontrunners in innovation, adequately prepared to confront the challenges of future markets. Implementing this progressive strategy amplifies the portfolio’s capacity for financial gain and fortifies the organization’s reputation as a trailblazer, thereby enticing collaborations, capital infusion, and skilled personnel. In addition, a contemporary portfolio exhibits enhanced resilience against legal challenges and competition due to its incorporation of a more extensive assortment of current advancements. Organizations can effectively safeguard their intellectual property assets, uphold market dominance, and align with their long-term strategic objectives by consistently updating their portfolios of patents.

Add Value Chain Thinking

To identify new opportunities for innovation and monetization, integrating value chain thinking into intellectual property (IP) strategy requires a comprehensive analysis of the entire value chain, from the procurement of raw materials to the delivery to the end-user. This approach goes beyond the conventional emphasis on the product itself by considering how advancements can improve or generate efficiencies throughout the product’s entire life cycle. Through the analysis of interdependencies among various production, distribution, and consumption phases, organizations can detect deficiencies in their intellectual property coverage that, if remedied, can substantially enhance their market standing and financial prospects. Adopting this comprehensive Perspective promotes the issuance of patents that safeguard the fundamental product and the procedures, systems, and aids that facilitate its production and distribution in the marketplace. By incorporating the viewpoints of customers, suppliers, and partners into the value chain analysis, one can guarantee the development of a resilient intellectual property portfolio that encompasses advancements that benefit the organization and its network of stakeholders.

Additionally, creating intellectual property strategically aligned with the needs and opportunities identified within a business’s network of relationships is facilitated by adopting a value chain perspective. This consists of obtaining patents that provide competitive procurement, manufacturing, logistics, and customer engagement benefits. As a result, innovations that streamline operations, reduce expenses, or improve the attractiveness of products are safeguarded. By conducting a thorough analysis of the value chain, which encompasses the dynamics of customers, suppliers, and partners, organizations can cultivate an intellectual property portfolio that is both diversified and resilient. This portfolio serves the dual purpose of protecting the organization’s proprietary innovations and facilitating negotiations for collaborations and partnerships by providing valuable intellectual property solutions that target stakeholders’ unique requirements and obstacles throughout the value chain. As a result, the incorporation of value chain thinking into intellectual property strategy expands the range of innovations in the portfolio, thereby creating prospects for monetization and cultivating more robust, strategic connections with clients, suppliers, and collaborators.

Fill Gaps or White Spaces

Filling gaps or white spaces in a portfolio of patents entails a methodical analysis aimed at identifying and focusing on areas devoid of innovation or coverage. This serves to expand the portfolio’s scope to encompass a broader range of technologies and applications. White spaces refer to essentially unexplored prospects in the realm of technology, devoid of patent claims for innovation. These may be present in sub-technology domains that support the primary technology framework, in crucial innovation areas that are indispensable for manufacturing operations, or even in product packaging and delivery. Organizations can identify specific areas where further intellectual property (IP) development could substantially fortify their competitive edge by delineating these “white spaces.” By employing this procedure, the organization safeguards untapped technological domains and guarantees a comprehensive portfolio that encompasses every facet of the product lifecycle and its ecosystem. By addressing these deficiencies, it becomes possible to safeguard innovations that have the potential to significantly enhance product attributes, optimize production processes, or provide unprecedented user experiences, thus contributing considerable value to the portfolio.

Furthermore, by investigating untapped markets in sub-technology domains and pivotal innovation sectors associated with production or packaging, organizations can secure patents that protect the complete value proposition of a given product. This approach acknowledges that innovation encompasses the processes that facilitate and optimize the production of the final product as well. For example, advancements in manufacturing methodologies that optimize efficiency or velocity can be equally or more valuable than the product itself, bestowing a substantial competitive advantage upon a business. Similarly, advancements in packaging that improve the quality of the user experience or extend the shelf life of a product have the potential to introduce new markets and distinguish a brand. Through a systematic process of identifying and addressing these deficiencies, organizations safeguard these gradual yet vital advancements and establish an extensive web of intellectual property rights that can discourage rivals and generate numerous revenue streams via licensing or exclusive utilization. By providing such extensive protection, the organization guarantees that its intellectual property holdings are resilient, adaptable, and in line with present and forthcoming market prospects; this fosters continuous innovation and expansion.

Force Future Citations

The deliberate intention behind strategically crafting patents to serve as foundational for future innovations is to guarantee that these patents function as indispensable pillars for subsequent technological advancements. This approach is based on the premise that patent examiners commonly produce patent citations during patent examination. Including these citations in new patent documents to indicate prior art signifies that the technologies described in the cited patents have been built upon or influenced by the new invention. Therefore, the frequent citation of a patent indicates that the patent office considers it a seminal technological work that serves as the basis for subsequent advancements. The recognition of the original patent by patent examiners serves to emphasize its significance and pertinence to the field, thereby augmenting its perceived worth in the industry.

The number of citations received by a patent not only underscores its importance but also provides prospective purchasers, collaborators, and competitors with an indication of its fundamental contribution to the progression of technology. Patents frequently referenced are regarded as standards within their specific fields, solidifying the patent holder’s position as a fundamental contributor to technological advancement. This may garner interest from businesses seeking to invest in emerging technologies, acquire valuable intellectual property, or identify strategic development partners. Their potential value is underscored by the fact that patent examiners regard these patents as pivotal references in advancing technology. This recognition can substantially influence the strategic decisions of other entities within the ecosystem. Hence, the strategic development of foundational patents enhances their worth and establishes the patent holder as a frontrunner in innovation, potentially granting access to fresh avenues for financial gain and cooperative ventures within the field.

Connect Portfolio to the Market

Linking a portfolio of patents to the market is a sophisticated approach that acknowledges patents as indispensable instruments for augmenting current products, enhancing operational efficiencies, decreasing expenses, or elevating the standard of excellence for other participants in the sector. This strategy transcends the concept of legal safeguards and perceives patents as critical elements that have the potential to contribute substantial value to the broader market ecosystem. As an illustration, a patent might present a novel resolution that augments the practicality or desirability of goods provided by competing firms, thus transforming it into a desirable asset for licensing or collaboration. Similarly, a patent may serve as a protective covering for a pivotal technology that significantly enhances the quality of goods, decreases production expenses, or revolutionizes manufacturing procedures, constituting a valuable asset for organizations endeavoring to attain a competitive advantage or streamline their activities.

In addition, establishing “block patents” is occasionally employed to link patents strategically with the marketplace. These patents impede rivals from producing, utilizing, or vending a specific product while not violating the patent rights. Employing patents in this manner strategically can serve as an effective mechanism to regulate a specific sector of the industry, compelling competitors to pursue licenses, form alliances, or identify alternate approaches that do not violate the patent. Organizations can strategically align their patent portfolio with other market participants’ operational, financial, or strategic interests, thereby capitalizing on their intellectual property assets as proactive tools for revenue generation rather than merely defensive purposes. Achieving this alignment necessitates a comprehensive comprehension of market demands, vulnerabilities of competitors, and potential avenues for cooperation. Such knowledge guarantees that the portfolio of patents is not solely technically resilient but also intricately intertwined with the commercial intricacies of the sector.

Add Other IP Types

The strategic integration of diverse forms of intellectual property (IP) into a portfolio of patents augments its scope and profundity, thereby substantially expanding its utility across multiple industries and its capacity for financial gain. Companies can enhance the scope of innovation protection by extending the scope of intellectual property (IP) protection beyond conventional patents to encompass business models, kits, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning (ML) technologies, equipment, and compositions. This all-encompassing safeguarding measure ensures the integrity of a product’s proprietary systems, underlying business processes, methods of operation, and technical components. For example, safeguarding innovations in data processing or automation that are vital for operational efficiency can be achieved by protecting IP rights on novel business models, which can provide a competitive advantage in how products or services are presented to consumers. Similarly, patents on AI/ML technologies can protect progress in data processing or automation. Similarly, chemical formulations and specialized product offerings can be safeguarded by acquiring IP rights for compositions and kits. By taking this comprehensive approach to managing intellectual property portfolios, a company can guarantee protection for all of its innovations, thereby increasing its worth and appeal to prospective licensees or partners.

Furthermore, diversifying the intellectual property (IP) portfolio recognizes the intricate characteristics of contemporary products and services, which frequently integrate numerous innovative and technological components to provide value. By protecting these elements strategically throughout the value chain, businesses can establish a stronger market position and create multiple entry barriers for competitors. This approach enhances the portfolio’s capacity to generate income via licensing agreements and partnerships. It creates fresh opportunities for strategic collaborations that capitalize on the complete spectrum of the organization’s intellectual property assets. For instance, an organization that possesses patented AI/ML technology and safeguarded business models might discover exceptional prospects in sectors undergoing digital transformation, where there is a significant demand for both innovative business strategies and technological advancements. Incorporating supplementary intellectual property categories into a portfolio serves a purpose beyond mere legal safeguarding for an expanded spectrum of advancements. Instead, it aims to strategically situate the organization at the vanguard of its field, poised to exploit nascent prospects and propel subsequent expansion.

Create Today and Future Improvements

It is crucial to anticipate forthcoming technological developments, and market demands to sustain the value and relevance of a portfolio of patents in the long run. This form of foresight entails the ongoing surveillance of technological developments, consumer conduct, regulatory modifications, and industry dynamics to anticipate potential locations for future innovations. By proactively identifying these prospective domains of progress, organizations can guarantee that their intellectual property not only satisfies present market needs but also positions itself to exploit forthcoming prospects. By adopting this methodology, generating novel patents that correspond with projected technological developments and evolving consumer demands is possible. This guarantees that the portfolio maintains its position as a leader in innovation. Further, it entails modifying and enlarging current patents to encompass more extensive facets of technology that might acquire significance in the future. By actively anticipating forthcoming enhancements, this strategic approach guarantees that the intellectual property assets will persist in offering opportunities to generate revenue and maintain competitive advantages amidst market evolution; thus, it prevents the portfolio from becoming antiquated in swift technological progress.

To position the portfolio for present and future enhancements, a flexible and adaptable intellectual property strategy is necessary, capable of promptly reacting to unforeseen technological advancements and changes in market preferences. Adaptability is of the utmost importance in sectors marked by rapid innovation cycles, wherein present advancements can swiftly transform into future benchmarks. Organizations can cultivate a portfolio that is adaptable and robust in the face of present challenges and capable of undergoing expansion or pivoting in light of forthcoming developments by adopting a proactive stance. Comprising such a portfolio is of immense value in sustaining long-term growth and preserving a market leadership position. Furthermore, it amplifies the appeal of the intellectual property assets to prospective licensees and collaborators seeking technologies that will sustain their relevance and provide value in the long run. By proactively looking ahead to present and future advancements, organizations can guarantee that their portfolio of patents is a strategic asset that propels continuous innovation and prosperity rather than merely recollecting previous accomplishments.

Benefits of Using Invention on Demand

Enhanced Portfolio Relevance: In the current environment of rapid innovation, it is critical to maintain a competitive edge by ensuring that patent portfolios reflect the most recent technological developments. By taking this proactive stance, portfolios are guaranteed to maintain their relevance by considering the most recent technological advancements and trends, thus safeguarding their value for monetization. Through ongoing portfolio enhancement and diversification to encompass nascent technologies, organizations can guarantee that their intellectual property assets not only mirror prevailing industry norms but also position themselves at the forefront of forthcoming advancements. Attracting potential buyers or licensees who frequently seek patents at the vanguard of technological innovation requires this relevance.

Enhanced Potential for Monetization: By modernizing intellectual property assets and ensuring they align with present and future market demands, Invention on Demand significantly contributes to exploring untapped monetization opportunities. By strategically refining and expanding the patent portfolio, avenues for licensing agreements, sales, and previously inaccessible partnerships are created. Invention on Demand enables a more flexible and profitable strategy for monetizing intellectual property by enhancing the portfolio’s appeal and applicability across a broader spectrum of industries and technologies. This effectively harnesses the complete potential of patents as strategic business assets.

Enhanced Patent Quality: The fundamental tenet of the Invention on Demand approach is the production of patents of superior quality. By emphasizing patents that effectively tackle unfulfilled requirements, present innovative resolutions, and are probable to endure the stringent evaluation process of patent examination, this methodology substantially improves the overall caliber of the portfolio. Subsequent inventors are more inclined to reference high-quality patents, which serve as validation of their fundamental significance and augments their market worth—emphasizing quality rather than quantity guarantees that resources are allocated towards the creation of patents that not only facilitate technological progress but also have more significant potential for revenue generation via licensing or sales.

Invention on Demand promotes a strategic approach to intellectual property development by prioritizing areas with the highest potential for impact and financial gain. By conducting an exhaustive analysis of market trends, competitor activities, and technological advancements, this strategic approach identifies opportunities for intellectual property (IP) to fill a critical market void or provide a competitive advantage. By focusing their endeavors on these promising domains, organizations can construct a targeted and influential collection of patents that increases the probability of attracting investors, partners, and licensees, optimizing the return on their intellectual property investments.

Accelerated Time to Market: The ability to expedite the process of commercializing inventions is a fundamental benefit of Invention on Demand. Through the optimization of the development and patenting procedures, this methodology grants organizations the ability to exploit nascent market prospects at a quicker pace in comparison to conventional strategies. In sectors where the opportunity to leverage emerging technologies is restricted, the capability to escalate rapidly from idea to patent to product introduction is of immense value. The ability to rapidly bring new inventions to market improves their commercial feasibility and establishes companies as frontrunners in innovation prepared to address consumer needs with prompt resolutions.

Diversifying an organization’s intellectual property portfolio by including an extensive array of patent types and assets constitutes an additional significant advantage of Invention on Demand. This approach to diversification expands the scope of protection beyond conventional product patents to encompass design patents, business methods, and software algorithms, among other things. By diversifying its range of innovations, the portfolio enhances its resistance to fluctuations in market demand and technological advancements, thereby guaranteeing the continued value of the organization’s intellectual property assets in various scenarios and applications. Maintaining long-term revenue streams from intellectual property and negotiating strategic partnerships and licensing agreements require this adaptability.

Enhanced Success Rate: The Invention on Demand methodology exhibits noteworthy success, as 85 percent of patent applications submitted using this approach ultimately attain issuance. The substantial probability of approval is greatly enhanced by the meticulous planning, research, and strategic alignment that comprise each patent application, as evidenced by the high success rate. Through the augmentation of patent issuance probabilities, Invention on Demand not only substantiates the novelty and excellence of the inventions but also aids in constructing a more robust and authoritative portfolio of patents.

Invention on Demand prioritizes cost effectiveness through the optimization of the invention procedure. By avoiding allocating time and resources to concepts with limited prospects for success or financial gain, this methodology directs attention toward innovations with the most significant potential for revolutionizing the market and generating a favorable return on investment. Organizations can optimize the value provided by individual patents and decrease the overall expense of portfolio development by allocating their R&D and IP budgets more efficiently by prioritizing patents and projects with higher success probabilities.

Improved Market Alignment: A critical element of Invention on Demand is guaranteeing that innovations are precisely synchronized with the demands and prospects of the market. This alignment necessitates comprehending the present market environment, encompassing competitive pressures, industry developments, and customer demands. By customizing the intellectual property (IP) strategy to consider these elements, businesses can enhance their innovations’ commercial viability and appeal, thereby increasing their appeal to prospective purchasers, licensees, and collaborators. Adopting a market-oriented strategy enhances the probability of new patents achieving commercial success and fortifies the organization’s standing as a frontrunner in innovation.

Proactive Adaptation to Technological Change: By utilizing Invention on Demand, organizations are empowered to adjust to technological change, guaranteeing sustained innovation leadership proactively. Through the ability to predict forthcoming trends and emerging technologies, this approach enables organizations to strategically align their patent portfolios with the forthcoming surge in market demands and technological progressions. By adopting this progressive strategy, the organization ensures a niche for its groundbreaking products in forthcoming markets and positions itself as an industry leader, prepared to exploit emerging prospects and maneuver through the complexities of an ever-changing technological environment. Proactive adaptation is of the utmost importance to maintain a competitive advantage over the long term and foster ongoing innovation and growth within the industry.


In a rapidly evolving technological landscape, the ability to monetize patent portfolios effectively requires not just innovation but innovation on Demand. This methodology addresses the inherent challenges within traditional patent portfolios, such as gaps in coverage, relevance, and alignment with market needs. By adopting Invention on Demand, entities can revitalize their IP strategies, ensuring their portfolios are optimized for today’s market and positioned to capitalize on future opportunities. In doing so, they unlock the full potential of their intellectual property, transforming it into a powerful engine for growth, competitiveness, and financial return.